|
Message-ID: <CAGXu5j+=j7Gy+D0wzZ44NPAK1PYyp1gHU-GQQOBCLi4fRc9UmQ@mail.gmail.com> Date: Mon, 28 Nov 2011 11:35:10 -0800 From: Kees Cook <keescook@...omium.org> To: Vasiliy Kulikov <segoon@...nwall.com> Cc: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-security-module@...r.kernel.org, kernel-hardening@...ts.openwall.com, "Serge E. Hallyn" <serge@...lyn.com> Subject: Re: [RFC -resend] Make Yama pid_ns aware On Mon, Nov 28, 2011 at 11:16 AM, Vasiliy Kulikov <segoon@...nwall.com> wrote: > As Yama's sysctls are about defining a security policy for the system, > it is reasonable to define it per container in case of LXC containers > (or out-of-tree alternatives like OpenVZ). In my opinion they belong > to pid namespace. With per-pid_ns sysctls it is possible to create > multiple containers with different ptrace, /tmp, etc. policies. > [...] > Signed-off-by: Vasiliy Kulikov <segoon@...nwall.com> Thanks! I'll include this in the next Yama patch set. Acked-by: Kees Cook <keescook@...omium.org> -Kees -- Kees Cook ChromeOS Security
Powered by blists - more mailing lists
Confused about mailing lists and their use? Read about mailing lists on Wikipedia and check out these guidelines on proper formatting of your messages.