[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20111121163407.d8946ad8.akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Date: Mon, 21 Nov 2011 16:34:07 -0800
From: Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>
To: Vasiliy Kulikov <segooon@...il.com>
Cc: kernel-hardening@...ts.openwall.com, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
Alexey Dobriyan <adobriyan@...il.com>, Al Viro <viro@...iv.linux.org.uk>,
"H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@...or.com>, Greg KH <greg@...ah.com>, Theodore Tso
<tytso@....EDU>, Alan Cox <alan@...rguk.ukuu.org.uk>, Linus Torvalds
<torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>
Subject: Re: [RFC v2 1/3] procfs: parse mount options
On Sat, 19 Nov 2011 15:01:26 +0400
Vasiliy Kulikov <segooon@...il.com> wrote:
> This patch adds support of procfs mount options.
> Actual mount options are coming in the next patches.
The patches look sane to me.
I assume that `mount -o remount' has been tested and works as expected?
I also assume that any file which was opened prior to the remount will
remain accessible to any process which has the fd. Is this acceptable
from a security/operational POV?
Powered by blists - more mailing lists
Confused about mailing lists and their use?
Read about mailing lists on Wikipedia
and check out these
guidelines on proper formatting of your messages.
