|
Message-ID: <20111107234516.34a58be6@lxorguk.ukuu.org.uk> Date: Mon, 7 Nov 2011 23:45:16 +0000 From: Alan Cox <alan@...rguk.ukuu.org.uk> To: Theodore Tso <tytso@....edu> Cc: Greg KH <greg@...ah.com>, Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>, "H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@...or.com>, Vasiliy Kulikov <segoon@...nwall.com>, Eric Paris <eparis@...isplace.org>, kernel-hardening@...ts.openwall.com, Valdis.Kletnieks@...edu, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, Alexey Dobriyan <adobriyan@...il.com>, Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>, linux-security-module@...r.kernel.org Subject: Re: Re: [PATCH] proc: restrict access to /proc/interrupts > Yup. But if revoke has come up, I'd like to remind folks that there are good uses of it besides just tty devices that receive hangup events. Having the modem connection disappear and the USB device disappear isn't all that different from a conceptual point of view. And for USB tty which actually treat them the same and do exactly this 8) Alan
Powered by blists - more mailing lists
Confused about mailing lists and their use? Read about mailing lists on Wikipedia and check out these guidelines on proper formatting of your messages.