[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <m2ei0olnua.fsf@firstfloor.org>
Date: Sat, 13 Aug 2011 19:38:05 -0700
From: Andi Kleen <andi@...stfloor.org>
To: "H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@...or.com>
Cc: Vasiliy Kulikov <segoon@...nwall.com>, Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>, Ingo Molnar <mingo@...hat.com>, James Morris <jmorris@...ei.org>, kernel-hardening@...ts.openwall.com, x86@...nel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-security-module@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [RFC] x86: restrict pid namespaces to 32 or 64 bit syscalls
"H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@...or.com> writes:
>
> IA64 is totally different. I'm extremely sceptical to this patch; it feels like putting code in a super-hot path to paper over a problem that has to be fixed anyway.
Sounds to me a better alternative would be more aggressive, pro-active
fuzzing of the compat calls.
-Andi
--
ak@...ux.intel.com -- Speaking for myself only
Powered by blists - more mailing lists
Confused about mailing lists and their use?
Read about mailing lists on Wikipedia
and check out these
guidelines on proper formatting of your messages.
