|
Message-ID: <m2ei0olnua.fsf@firstfloor.org> Date: Sat, 13 Aug 2011 19:38:05 -0700 From: Andi Kleen <andi@...stfloor.org> To: "H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@...or.com> Cc: Vasiliy Kulikov <segoon@...nwall.com>, Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>, Ingo Molnar <mingo@...hat.com>, James Morris <jmorris@...ei.org>, kernel-hardening@...ts.openwall.com, x86@...nel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-security-module@...r.kernel.org Subject: Re: [RFC] x86: restrict pid namespaces to 32 or 64 bit syscalls "H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@...or.com> writes: > > IA64 is totally different. I'm extremely sceptical to this patch; it feels like putting code in a super-hot path to paper over a problem that has to be fixed anyway. Sounds to me a better alternative would be more aggressive, pro-active fuzzing of the compat calls. -Andi -- ak@...ux.intel.com -- Speaking for myself only
Powered by blists - more mailing lists
Confused about mailing lists and their use? Read about mailing lists on Wikipedia and check out these guidelines on proper formatting of your messages.