[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20110801120750.5c0e6d2b.akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Date: Mon, 1 Aug 2011 12:07:50 -0700
From: Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>
To: Vasiliy Kulikov <segoon@...nwall.com>
Cc: Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>, kernel-hardening@...ts.openwall.com,
"Paul E. McKenney" <paul.mckenney@...aro.org>,
Manuel Lauss
<manuel.lauss@...glemail.com>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, Richard
Weinberger <richard@....at>,
torvalds@...ux-foundation.org, Marc Zyngier
<maz@...terjones.org>
Subject: Re: Re: initcall dependency problem (ns vs.
threads)
On Mon, 1 Aug 2011 23:03:41 +0400
Vasiliy Kulikov <segoon@...nwall.com> wrote:
> > Are we talking about init_ipc_ns.ids[] here? If so, did you try
> > initializing the three rwsems at compile-time?
> >
> > That's rather a nasty hack though. It'd be better to run the mystery
> > init function before starting the threads.
>
> Looks like it solves the race.
What patch are you talking about here?
> However, I think it should be solved on
> another level.
What level?
> Other bugs might be hidden with this race.
What bugs?
Powered by blists - more mailing lists
Confused about mailing lists and their use?
Read about mailing lists on Wikipedia
and check out these
guidelines on proper formatting of your messages.
