[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20110719074043.GA3942@albatros>
Date: Tue, 19 Jul 2011 11:40:43 +0400
From: Vasiliy Kulikov <segoon@...nwall.com>
To: kernel-hardening@...ts.openwall.com
Cc: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@...hat.com>, "H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@...or.com>,
x86@...nel.org, Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de>,
Christoph Lameter <cl@...ux-foundation.org>,
Pekka Enberg <penberg@...nel.org>, Matt Mackall <mpm@...enic.com>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-arch@...r.kernel.org,
linux-mm@...ck.org
Subject: Re: Re: [RFC v2] implement SL*B and stack
usercopy runtime checks
On Mon, Jul 18, 2011 at 11:52 -0700, Andrew Morton wrote:
> > +noinline bool __kernel_access_ok(const void *ptr, unsigned long len)
>
> noinline seems unneeded
Ah, understood what you mean. It is .c, and users are in other .c, so
it is indeed redundant.
Thanks!
--
Vasiliy Kulikov
http://www.openwall.com - bringing security into open computing environments
Powered by blists - more mailing lists
Confused about mailing lists and their use?
Read about mailing lists on Wikipedia
and check out these
guidelines on proper formatting of your messages.
