Follow @Openwall on Twitter for new release announcements and other news
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <1311016102.23043.235.camel@calx>
Date: Mon, 18 Jul 2011 14:08:22 -0500
From: Matt Mackall <mpm@...enic.com>
To: Vasiliy Kulikov <segoon@...nwall.com>
Cc: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>, 
 kernel-hardening@...ts.openwall.com, Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>, 
 Ingo Molnar <mingo@...hat.com>, "H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@...or.com>,
 x86@...nel.org, Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de>, Christoph Lameter
 <cl@...ux-foundation.org>, Pekka Enberg <penberg@...nel.org>, Andrew Morton
 <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,  linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
 linux-arch@...r.kernel.org, linux-mm@...ck.org
Subject: Re: [RFC v2] implement SL*B and stack usercopy runtime checks

On Mon, 2011-07-18 at 22:39 +0400, Vasiliy Kulikov wrote:
> This patch implements 2 additional checks for the data copied from
> kernelspace to userspace and vice versa (original PAX_USERCOPY from PaX
> patch).  Currently there are some very simple and cheap comparisons of
> supplied size and the size of a copied object known at the compile time
> in copy_* functions.  This patch enhances these checks to check against
> stack frame boundaries and against SL*B object sizes.
> 
> More precisely, it checks:
> 
> 1) if the data touches the stack, checks whether it fully fits in the stack
> and whether it fully fits in a single stack frame.  The latter is arch
> dependent, currently it is implemented for x86 with CONFIG_FRAME_POINTER=y
> only.  It limits infoleaks/overwrites to a single frame and local variables
> only, and prevents saved return instruction pointer overwriting.
> 
> 2) if the data is from the SL*B cache, checks whether it fully fits in a
> slab page and whether it overflows a slab object.  E.g. if the memory
> was allocated as kmalloc(64, GFP_KERNEL) and one tries to copy 150
> bytes, the copy would fail.

FYI, this should almost certainly be split into (at least) two patches:

- the stack check
- the SL*B check (probably one patch per allocator, preceded by one for
any shared infrastructure)

-- 
Mathematics is the supreme nostalgia of our time.


Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Confused about mailing lists and their use? Read about mailing lists on Wikipedia and check out these guidelines on proper formatting of your messages.