Follow @Openwall on Twitter for new release announcements and other news
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20110714141557.GA29900@openwall.com>
Date: Thu, 14 Jul 2011 18:15:57 +0400
From: Solar Designer <solar@...nwall.com>
To: kernel-hardening@...ts.openwall.com
Subject: Re: RLIMIT_NPROC check in set_user()

Vasiliy,

On Wed, Jul 13, 2011 at 01:48:56PM +0400, Solar Designer wrote:
> LKML discussion a few years ago, ...

I found it:

Subject: [PATCH] set*uid() must not fail-and-return on OOM/rlimits
http://lists.openwall.net/linux-kernel/2006/08/20/4

and lots of followups.  Alan NAK'ed the change at the time.  I think he
was wrong.  Anyway, there's useful info in that thread - please read it.

I think we should only bring the process killing suggestion up when the
move of RLIMIT_NPROC check is committed.

Alexander

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Confused about mailing lists and their use? Read about mailing lists on Wikipedia and check out these guidelines on proper formatting of your messages.