[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20110706183511.GA3299@albatros>
Date: Wed, 6 Jul 2011 22:35:12 +0400
From: Vasiliy Kulikov <segoon@...nwall.com>
To: kernel-hardening@...ts.openwall.com
Cc: akpm@...ux-foundation.org, daniel.lezcano@...e.fr,
ebiederm@...ssion.com, mingo@...e.hu, rdunlap@...otime.net,
tj@...nel.org
Subject: Re: Re: [PATCH] shm: handle separate PID
namespaces case
On Wed, Jul 06, 2011 at 20:08 +0200, Oleg Nesterov wrote:
> Cough. I stil think exit_shm() should check .in_use != 0 lockless.
Give me a proof it is safe for all architectures :)
--
Vasiliy Kulikov
http://www.openwall.com - bringing security into open computing environments
Powered by blists - more mailing lists
Confused about mailing lists and their use?
Read about mailing lists on Wikipedia
and check out these
guidelines on proper formatting of your messages.
