[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20110619141232.GA3444@albatros>
Date: Sun, 19 Jun 2011 18:12:32 +0400
From: Vasiliy Kulikov <segoon@...nwall.com>
To: kernel-hardening@...ts.openwall.com
Subject: Re: HARDEN_VM86
Solar,
On Wed, Jun 15, 2011 at 18:38 +0400, Solar Designer wrote:
> BTW, a related syscall is modify_ldt(2). You could want to research
> what programs use it, and consider restricting it as well. Perhaps with
> a separate sysctl?
It starts to look like seccomp v2.
http://thread.gmane.org/gmane.linux.kernel/833539/focus=833864
- but with capable(CAP_SYS_RAWIO) instead of just deny and static
syscalls list. Will Drewry is trying to push his limiting patch with
ftrace-like syntax restrictions, but (a) it is not yet applied and (b)
it is not inherited by execve's:
https://lkml.org/lkml/2011/6/12/184
If it was not limited to one task it would serve our needs :(
--
Vasiliy
Powered by blists - more mailing lists
Confused about mailing lists and their use?
Read about mailing lists on Wikipedia
and check out these
guidelines on proper formatting of your messages.
