Follow @Openwall on Twitter for new release announcements and other news
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <fdd501ab-2908-4ad6-bd1b-afe3e5b5e0cc@jeffunit.com>
Date: Tue, 8 Oct 2024 12:53:24 -0700
From: jeff <jeff@...funit.com>
To: john-users@...ts.openwall.com
Subject: Re: slow progress after --restore

On 10/7/2024 17:46, Solar Designer wrote:
> On Mon, Oct 07, 2024 at 05:43:21PM -0700, jeff wrote:
>> On 10/7/2024 17:29, Solar Designer wrote:
>>> On Mon, Oct 07, 2024 at 04:23:54PM -0700, jeff wrote:
>>> This isn't supposed to be the case - we record both the rule and the
>>> place in the wordlist.  However, even if it were the case, it would not
>>> cause the exact behavior you observe - with fast hashes like NT, it
>>> doesn't take long (not anywhere near as long as 8000 seconds) for one
>>> rule to complete and advance to the next one.
>> I do have a big wordlist. It is 811 million words.
> Sure.  It's by far not big enough to take 8000 seconds.  Maybe 100.
>
> Alexander
I restarted john, and starting finding hashes right away (though slowly).
Here is my output of wc on john.pot every 1000 seconds:
  16192658  16545485 816619302 john.pot
  16192673  16545500 816620128 john.pot
  16192690  16545519 816621052 john.pot
  16192693  16545522 816621213 john.pot

So I guess something quite odd was going on before, but it is not 
reproducible.
jeff


Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Confused about mailing lists and their use? Read about mailing lists on Wikipedia and check out these guidelines on proper formatting of your messages.