|
Message-ID: <Q2GDcAn3cfvhcSfqRowfvtBUTebc0VkOvJN7BkaYwWYzpz0ao2uWYgGdF5pV-y0ip3NO7I7LRbBQPAXx9hx9c4WJaMgJG-VQbfvozOM9V2k=@pm.me> Date: Mon, 02 May 2022 16:55:56 +0000 From: Foamy Mai Tai <foamymaitai@...me> To: john-users@...ts.openwall.com Subject: RE: More CPU cores vs faster base frequency Thanks for the reply! > > are you sure these are indeed cores? It would appear so: https://ark.intel.com/content/www/us/en/ark/compare.html?productIds=120475,120489 > What about: > > 20 x 2,4 = 48 > 4 x 3,6 = 14,4 I agree, that math suggests a clear winner. I just wasn't sure if there was some cost to parallelizing (apologies if incorrect term) john over numerous cores that I was neglecting to consider than might tip the scale in favor of higher base frequency. Also, I mainly focused my CPU search around three variables: # of cores, frequency, and AVX-512 capability. Do any other variables (L3 cache size, max memory speed, other specific feature, etc) matter for this purpose? Again, many thanks!
Powered by blists - more mailing lists
Confused about mailing lists and their use? Read about mailing lists on Wikipedia and check out these guidelines on proper formatting of your messages.