[<prev] [next>] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <164394274874.7.9111826329963903532.27396958@slmail.me>
Date: Fri, 4 Feb 2022 02:45:41 +0000
From: hamano_clevage@...ail.me
To: john-users@...ts.openwall.com
Subject: Bitcoin hash difference
Hi,
When I run the bitcoin2john.py script I have stored from 2019 it
generates me an hash ending differently than when I run it using the
current version.
2019 bitcoin2john.py version hash:
$bitcoin$64$<_the_identical_part_>$1318$96$55b605d8050d8dc073eef17df20ef760dbe6885217e9$130$04e93d2592735ec271e0c65e0925854a710e2c648aff1d79a22fe93
current bitcoin2john.py version hash:
$bitcoin$64$<_the_identical_part_>$16$adfbb9cfa83e9cf6$135318$2$00$2$00
I would expect them to be the same. The first part is the same but after
the 4th dollar sign the outcome is very different.
Should it be the same with the old and the new version?
Does this influence the result when using it in Hashcat or John the Ripper?
Regards,
Tony
Powered by blists - more mailing lists
Confused about mailing lists and their use?
Read about mailing lists on Wikipedia
and check out these
guidelines on proper formatting of your messages.
