Follow @Openwall on Twitter for new release announcements and other news
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20211227152014.GA12333@openwall.com>
Date: Mon, 27 Dec 2021 16:20:14 +0100
From: Solar Designer <solar@...nwall.com>
To: john-users@...ts.openwall.com
Subject: Re: Some Osx test whit gcc versions from to 11

Hi Alberto,

I haven't looked at those files you reference - I think it'd be best if
you post the results right in here in plain text.  However, I have what
I think is an important comment:

On Mon, Dec 27, 2021 at 02:52:37PM +0100, Alberto Panu wrote:
> I massaged the code for gcc >= 10 compiling and it work, if need I could 
> try create a patch.

It sounds like you're playing with 1.9.0-jumbo-1.  While that's our
latest release, it is not a good choice for such experiments, nor even
for most uses now that it's been 2.5 years since the release.  You'd
probably want to switch to using our bleeding-jumbo code off GitHub.
That one should compile with latest gcc as-is and without any issues.

Alexander

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Confused about mailing lists and their use? Read about mailing lists on Wikipedia and check out these guidelines on proper formatting of your messages.