[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20211025171904.GB27806@fantomas.sk>
Date: Mon, 25 Oct 2021 19:19:04 +0200
From: Matus UHLAR - fantomas <uhlar@...tomas.sk>
To: john-users@...ts.openwall.com
Subject: Re: GPU benchmarks?
>On Sat, Oct 16, 2021 at 08:16:22PM +0200, Matus UHLAR - fantomas wrote:
>> are you guys intertested in putting GPU benchmarks to wiki?
On 22.10.21 16:54, Solar Designer wrote:
>Maybe. The existing list of selected CPU benchmarks is certainly quite
>dated and weird,
comparing CPUs with GPUs ans FPGAs with the same hashes could give us better
idea what (not) to use them for.
> and it's also weird we don't have any for GPU and FPGA
>in there.
that's why I'm asking.
BTW, do LWS and GWS matter here? shopuld they be at least shown in the
output?
>> If so, which hashes should be interesting to put there?
>
>All of them, but that would mean either just uploading entire redirected
>output from "--test --format=opencl" (which may actually be a reasonable
>thing to do) or setting up some automated processing of such files to
>present the results as a table.
for visual comparison, a table would be nice.
>So if selecting just some, I guess it'd be the various crypt(3) hash
>types, NT, LM, WPA-PSK, Bitcoin, archives... and this already feels a
>bit too many for manual entry. Maybe also include phpass and Drupal7,
>for comparison against their speeds on FPGA.
so we could start with same hashes as CPU tables have..
--
Matus UHLAR - fantomas, uhlar@...tomas.sk ; http://www.fantomas.sk/
Warning: I wish NOT to receive e-mail advertising to this address.
Varovanie: na tuto adresu chcem NEDOSTAVAT akukolvek reklamnu postu.
I intend to live forever - so far so good.
Powered by blists - more mailing lists
Confused about mailing lists and their use?
Read about mailing lists on Wikipedia
and check out these
guidelines on proper formatting of your messages.
