[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <74bcc6c0eecc1976153e76fc0bbfa3d0@smtp.hushmail.com>
Date: Wed, 10 Mar 2021 21:14:10 +0100
From: magnum <john.magnum@...hmail.com>
To: john-users@...ts.openwall.com
Subject: Re: Multi-gpu setup
On 2021-03-10 20:25, Michał Majchrowicz wrote:
>> As a cleaner workaround, you can run separate instances with "--node":
>>
>> ./john -se=1 -dev=1 -node=1-2/3 -format=something-opencl hash
>>
>> and concurrently:
>>
>> ./john -se=2 -dev=2 -node=3/3 -format=something-opencl hash
>
> This looks interesting. I already switched to separate dictionaries
> for every gpu on each node for now. Tough with your syntax I noticed
> you do NOT use --fork so does that mean with -se it will not require
> -node=1-15/28 to run 15 forks for single gpu ? :)
-se is short-cut for --session, the two jobs are started in eg. separate
terminals.
> In my case it wouldn't be so easy as the difference between those two
> gpus was something around 13 to 15
You can get more granularity: Split the job in many more "nodes" but
think of them as work items. Then do something like:
./john -se=1 -dev=1 -node=1-13/28 -format=something-opencl hash
./john -se=2 -dev=2 -node=14-28/28 -format=something-opencl hash
This will give session 1 46% of the job, and session 2 the remaining
54%. Note though that some of our modes will not manage to distribute
the work with that great detail - we're probably asking for more
granularity than we'll actually get. They shouldn't miss anything though.
magnum
Powered by blists - more mailing lists
Confused about mailing lists and their use?
Read about mailing lists on Wikipedia
and check out these
guidelines on proper formatting of your messages.
