|
Message-ID: <CABwuPXftTfa-md_Xasv6o37+NjBTzoy=SS_bn=4icdSpAOhJgg@mail.gmail.com> Date: Thu, 17 Sep 2020 17:53:50 +0100 From: Jasper Jones <jazjones9292@...il.com> To: john-users@...ts.openwall.com Subject: Re: cracking encrypted zip file Before starting to try cracking the actual password, I did try zip2john and then JtR with a small zip file I created with the same program (7zip) and encryption settings, and it worked. It looks like I need to let the current process finish before I can run a new one (something about john.rec file being in use), but I'll certainly make a note to run it again with a similarly sized file and give you all the info I can. In case anyone wants to have a quick go in the meantime, I attach a zipped file I just generated with the same version of 7zip as was used on the file I'm trying to crack. It contains a dummy .dat file filled with random text and is AES-256 encrypted with password: testforjohn2txt Thanks Jasper On Thu, 17 Sep 2020 at 17:25, Solar Designer <solar@...nwall.com> wrote: > On Thu, Sep 17, 2020 at 04:20:30PM +0100, Jasper Jones wrote: > > On Wed, 16 Sep 2020 at 20:51, Solar Designer <solar@...nwall.com> wrote: > > > On Wed, Sep 16, 2020 at 06:47:10AM +0100, Jasper Jones wrote: > > > > Loaded 1 password hash (ZIP, WinZip, [PKDF2-SHA1 128/128 AVX 4x1)" > > > > > > > > Does that look right? The reference to PKDF2-SHA1 instead of AES > concerns > > > > me, but I appreciate that could just be my ignorance showing. > > > > > > You've already figured this out (great!), but we might want to revise > > > this algorithm name string to also include AES. > > > > Cool. > > I just looked into this, and no - that algorithm name string is correct > as-is, and adding AES in there would be wrong. We're able to > distinguish correct vs. wrong passwords without ever using AES in there. > > > > As to the error you were getting originally: > > > > > > > > That said, I'm still getting an error as well: "ver 5.1 > > > > > wallet.zip/wallet.dat is not encrypted, or stored with non-handled > > > > > compression type". > > > > > > It certainly looks like you have more than one file, or one file more > > > than once, in that archive. It might even be that you have the > > > wallet.dat file in there in both encrypted and non-encrypted form. > > > > I'm pretty sure there's just the one file in there. I definitely wouldn't > > have encrypted it first and then zipped it. It was just zipped (using > 7Zip) > > with a password and AES256 encryption selected. There's also just the one > > file - wallet.dat - listed when you open the archive. > > OK. > > > > Alternatively, we have a bug resulting in that spurious message. > > > > I'll leave that to you to decide! :) > > We'd need to reproduce the problem for that. It would be great if you > manage to generate another encrypted WinZip archive, with dummy content > and a known password, yet trigger the same behavior from zip2john. This > will serve two purposes: (1) you'll know whether or not the password is > crackable with our current code despite of this error, and (2) we'll be > able to look into the issue on our end (assuming that you'll share that > archive with us). > > > > > > I don't have zipinfo (I'm on Windows), but I could download a > bootable > > > > > Linux distribution if that would help. > > > > > > I guess you can get zipinfo on Windows if you install Cygwin. > > > > Do you think it would help at this stage? > > It wouldn't help as much as generating a suitable dummy archive would, > but it might provide us with some extra clue. > > > Perhaps if the current run > > doesn't work I can look into that and see whether it gives more info than > > I've found so far. > > OK. > > Alexander > Content of type "text/html" skipped Download attachment "Test.zip" of type "application/x-zip-compressed" (452 bytes)
Powered by blists - more mailing lists
Confused about mailing lists and their use? Read about mailing lists on Wikipedia and check out these guidelines on proper formatting of your messages.