[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CAMrU6JBGS8Y42ZbHn_-A4CfUnAfduu3aN+5=yJSdcKLkGe6bQw@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Mon, 7 Sep 2020 03:17:13 -0500
From: David Sutherland <turnkit@...il.com>
To: john-users@...ts.openwall.com
Subject: Re: NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3000 Series Performance
thanks. both helpful responses for me.
On Mon, Sep 7, 2020 at 3:14 AM Lukas Odzioba <lukas.odzioba@...il.com>
wrote:
> pon., 7 wrz 2020 o 08:57 Anatoly Pugachev <matorola@...il.com> napisał(a):
> > some of the cuda performance stats released
> >
> https://videocardz.com/newz/nvidia-geforce-rtx-3080-168-of-rtx-2080-performance-in-cuda-and-opencl-benchmarks
>
> It is hard to guesstimate from it. During hashing we care about
> integer performance and a lot of those numbers are based on floating
> point operations, which find the most use in 3d graphics - that's why
> you can find a theoretical number of "flops" of a given GPU quite
> easily, but not a number of integer operations per second.
>
> BTW 3090 doesn't seem to make sense because for the same price you can
> go double 3080, or triple 3070.
> And as most of the Internet speculates 3000 should be pretty decent
> because it jumps from 12nm to 8nm and includes architectural changes
> at the same time.
> By the end of September, there should be some benchmarks available to
> answer your question without speculating.
> Personally I'd wait for BigNavi, competition is usually good for your
> wallet.
>
> Thanks,
> Lukas
>
--
David C. Sutherland | (310) 729-6411 (c) | Lindale, Texas
Powered by blists - more mailing lists
Confused about mailing lists and their use?
Read about mailing lists on Wikipedia
and check out these
guidelines on proper formatting of your messages.
