|
Message-ID: <BN4PR11MB0882FDBD7B5DBE21AA9F2CCAAA9B0@BN4PR11MB0882.namprd11.prod.outlook.com> Date: Fri, 25 Aug 2017 02:22:15 +0000 From: Glen B <lucky0106@....com> To: "john-users@...ts.openwall.com" <john-users@...ts.openwall.com> Subject: Re: Custom Windows build 1.8.0.9 - What happened to zip2john? Hey Robert, I can confirm what you've found, the earlier build did have the proper executables. I hope I can test a build from you soon if you won't mind! Glen On 8/24/2017 6:53 PM, rs904c@...scape.net wrote: > Hey, I'm Robert and the one who contributes almost all of the builds on the > custom build site. > > I think there was something definitely wrong with the bleeding version in > March 2017, and possibly now, when building with cygwin. > > See below for more details. > > I tested all of the symbolic link files in the Windows build from March 2017 > that I did and I can confirm there seems to be a problem with them. > > These all fail to run: > > base64conv > gpg2john > hccap2john > keepass2john > putty2john > racf2john > rar2john > unafs > undrop > unique > unshadow > > I then checked the previous version I made > "John-the-Ripper-v1.8.0-jumbo-1-Win-64". > In this version there are no files that are symbolic links. These all run > fine. > > base64conv.exe > calc_stat.exe > cprepair.exe > dmg2john.exe > genmkvpwd.exe > gpg2john.exe > hccap2john.exe > john.exe > keepass2john.exe > keychain2john.exe > keyring2john.exe > keystore2john.exe > kwallet2john.exe > luks2john.exe > mkvcalcproba.exe > pfx2john.exe > putty2john.exe > pwsafe2john.exe > racf2john.exe > rar2john.exe > raw2dyna.exe > ssh2john.exe > tgtsnarf.exe > truecrypt_volume2john.exe > uaf2john.exe > unafs.exe > undrop.exe > unique.exe > unshadow.exe > wpapcap2john.exe > zip2john.exe > > -- Robert B. Harris from VA > > -----Original Message----- > From: Solar Designer [mailto:solar@...nwall.com] > Sent: Friday, August 18, 2017 3:55 PM > To: john-users@...ts.openwall.com > Subject: Re: [john-users] Custom Windows build 1.8.0.9 - What happened to > zip2john? > > On Fri, Aug 18, 2017 at 07:16:03PM +0000, Glen B wrote: >> I really liked the earlier versions of JtR that were self-contained and > didn't require downloading anything else to be honest. > > This build wasn't meant to require anything extra either. According to what > you said, it's just a bug. > >> If this is just a symlink though, what is it symlink-ing to? The john > binary? If so, couldn't I just run john directly? > > Yes. You could run "john" directly if you copy or rename it so that it'd be > called "zip2john". > > Alexander > > > --- > This email has been checked for viruses by Avast antivirus software. > https://www.avast.com/antivirus >
Powered by blists - more mailing lists
Confused about mailing lists and their use? Read about mailing lists on Wikipedia and check out these guidelines on proper formatting of your messages.