[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <000601d31d44$c0fd6550$42f82ff0$@netscape.net>
Date: Thu, 24 Aug 2017 21:52:04 -0400
From: <rs904c@...scape.net>
To: <john-users@...ts.openwall.com>
Subject: RE: Custom Windows build 1.8.0.9 - What happened to zip2john?
Hey, I'm Robert and the one who contributes almost all of the builds on the
custom build site.
I think there was something definitely wrong with the bleeding version in
March 2017, and possibly now, when building with cygwin.
See below for more details.
I tested all of the symbolic link files in the Windows build from March 2017
that I did and I can confirm there seems to be a problem with them.
These all fail to run:
base64conv
gpg2john
hccap2john
keepass2john
putty2john
racf2john
rar2john
unafs
undrop
unique
unshadow
I then checked the previous version I made
"John-the-Ripper-v1.8.0-jumbo-1-Win-64".
In this version there are no files that are symbolic links. These all run
fine.
base64conv.exe
calc_stat.exe
cprepair.exe
dmg2john.exe
genmkvpwd.exe
gpg2john.exe
hccap2john.exe
john.exe
keepass2john.exe
keychain2john.exe
keyring2john.exe
keystore2john.exe
kwallet2john.exe
luks2john.exe
mkvcalcproba.exe
pfx2john.exe
putty2john.exe
pwsafe2john.exe
racf2john.exe
rar2john.exe
raw2dyna.exe
ssh2john.exe
tgtsnarf.exe
truecrypt_volume2john.exe
uaf2john.exe
unafs.exe
undrop.exe
unique.exe
unshadow.exe
wpapcap2john.exe
zip2john.exe
-- Robert B. Harris from VA
-----Original Message-----
From: Solar Designer [mailto:solar@...nwall.com]
Sent: Friday, August 18, 2017 3:55 PM
To: john-users@...ts.openwall.com
Subject: Re: [john-users] Custom Windows build 1.8.0.9 - What happened to
zip2john?
On Fri, Aug 18, 2017 at 07:16:03PM +0000, Glen B wrote:
> I really liked the earlier versions of JtR that were self-contained and
didn't require downloading anything else to be honest.
This build wasn't meant to require anything extra either. According to what
you said, it's just a bug.
> If this is just a symlink though, what is it symlink-ing to? The john
binary? If so, couldn't I just run john directly?
Yes. You could run "john" directly if you copy or rename it so that it'd be
called "zip2john".
Alexander
---
This email has been checked for viruses by Avast antivirus software.
https://www.avast.com/antivirus
Powered by blists - more mailing lists
Confused about mailing lists and their use?
Read about mailing lists on Wikipedia
and check out these
guidelines on proper formatting of your messages.
