[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20160830091613.GB1666@openwall.com>
Date: Tue, 30 Aug 2016 11:16:13 +0200
From: Solar Designer <solar@...nwall.com>
To: john-users@...ts.openwall.com
Subject: Re: Which is the correct hash?
On Mon, Aug 29, 2016 at 10:37:06PM +0200, magnum wrote:
> On 2016-08-29 21:00, Sebastian Heyn wrote:
> >-> the pkzip hash brutes at 19k/sec
> >-> the pkzip2 hash brutes at 100/sec (--fork=32 gives x32 speed)
> A more specific answer for your case is that the difference in speed you
> mention MAY be due to the older version defaulting to "file magic"
> whereas the newer does not.
Aren't both speeds way lower than expected, though? The pkzip format
normally benchmarks in the millions. I guess I am missing something.
Alexander
Powered by blists - more mailing lists
Confused about mailing lists and their use?
Read about mailing lists on Wikipedia
and check out these
guidelines on proper formatting of your messages.
