|
Message-ID: <571D699F.6020008@openwall.net> Date: Sun, 24 Apr 2016 19:49:35 -0500 From: jfoug <jfoug@...nwall.net> To: john-users@...ts.openwall.com Subject: Re: Rules 'C' command, wtf??? On 4/24/2016 6:46 PM, Frank Dittrich wrote: > For c, I expected exactly the current behavior, since I knew it worked > like this for years, but I never used C, and so I didn't care. For > just upper casing the first character, I would have used lt (plus some > extra logic to avoid duplicates in case l and c had been tried > before...). If the c and C implementations change, this change should > be documented. Frank The change certainly could be documented as going away, but it never was documented as existing in the first place. In fact the actual behavior was against what the documentation stated. It now actually properly follows the documentation.
Powered by blists - more mailing lists
Confused about mailing lists and their use? Read about mailing lists on Wikipedia and check out these guidelines on proper formatting of your messages.