|
Message-ID: <CAKvk7_7fgo4_U+FY87x1RW1GAWcwZwfpr6gUJcOJtXdtmBsT_Q@mail.gmail.com> Date: Sat, 30 Jan 2016 13:52:45 -0500 From: japhar81 <japhar81@...il.com> To: john-users@...ts.openwall.com Subject: RAR performance For anyone interested, I've been testing MPI scaling in AWS, using their c3.8xlarge (32-core) AMIs. Quick result set; One Node: Benchmarking: rar, RAR3 (4 characters) [SHA1 128/128 AVX 4x AES]... (32xMPI) DONE Raw: 1492 c/s real, 1492 c/s virtual Two Nodes: Benchmarking: rar, RAR3 (4 characters) [SHA1 128/128 AVX 4x AES]... (64xMPI) DONE Raw: 2984 c/s real, 2984 c/s virtual Four Nodes: Benchmarking: rar, RAR3 (4 characters) [SHA1 128/128 AVX 4x AES]... (128xMPI) DONE Raw: 5969 c/s real, 5969 c/s virtual Eight Nodes: Benchmarking: rar, RAR3 (4 characters) [SHA1 128/128 AVX 4x AES]... (256xMPI) DONE Raw: 11939 c/s real, 11939 c/s virtual Twelve Nodes: Benchmarking: rar, RAR3 (4 characters) [SHA1 128/128 AVX 4x AES]... (384xMPI) DONE Raw: 17908 c/s real, 17908 c/s virtual Sixteen Nodes: Benchmarking: rar, RAR3 (4 characters) [SHA1 128/128 AVX 4x AES]... (512xMPI) DONE Raw: 23878 c/s real, 23878 c/s virtual Twenty Nodes: Benchmarking: rar, RAR3 (4 characters) [SHA1 128/128 AVX 4x AES]... (640xMPI) DONE Raw: 29847 c/s real, 29847 c/s virtual
Powered by blists - more mailing lists
Confused about mailing lists and their use? Read about mailing lists on Wikipedia and check out these guidelines on proper formatting of your messages.