|
Message-ID: <20150807094531.GA29595@openwall.com> Date: Fri, 7 Aug 2015 12:45:31 +0300 From: Solar Designer <solar@...nwall.com> To: john-users@...ts.openwall.com Subject: Re: Benchmark result On Fri, Aug 07, 2015 at 11:38:00AM +0200, magnum wrote: > On 2015-08-07 09:36, Solar Designer wrote: > >On Fri, Aug 07, 2015 at 01:53:14AM +0200, Viktor Gazdag wrote: > >>./john --fork=8 --device=0,1,2,3,4,5,6,7 --format=Raw-SHA256-opencl > > > >This is a total waste of GPUs. Don't do it. For fast hashes (anything > >starting with raw-*, some others), we generally don't have efficient > >code on GPUs, with some recent exceptions (Sayantan has implemented mask > >mode on GPU recently, for a handful of fast hash types, but not for all). > > It's not a waste: Claudio implemented GPU-side mask for his raw formats > long ago! Oh, I must have missed that. We got to have a list of formats supporting GPU mask mode somewhere, or/and JtR should print a message indicating whether or not mask mode is implemented on the OpenCL device when you invoke any OpenCL format with mask mode. It should also warn when a fast hash format is invoked without mask mode. Viktor's command _is_ a waste of GPUs anyway: he didn't use mask mode. Alexander
Powered by blists - more mailing lists
Confused about mailing lists and their use? Read about mailing lists on Wikipedia and check out these guidelines on proper formatting of your messages.