|
Message-ID: <e547e884d765f8a06c288e115fc3988d@smtp.hushmail.com> Date: Sun, 02 Aug 2015 23:41:13 +0200 From: magnum <john.magnum@...hmail.com> To: john-users@...ts.openwall.com Subject: Re: Benchmark result On 2015-08-02 18:12, websiteaccess@...il.com wrote: > I have posted some days ago a message in this list, with screenshots about my problem about compiling JTR. You get them? Was it relevant to this thread at all? I have a considerable backlog right now. > If not, please send me directly a mail to websiteaccess@...il.com Trust me, you would not afford my hour rate - if I reply at all it'll be to the list. Not sure when I'll have time to even read it so your best bet is someone else answers. magnum >> Le 2 août 2015 à 16:07, magnum <john.magnum@...hmail.com> a écrit : >> >> On 2015-08-01 14:41, Solar Designer wrote: >>> On Fri, Jul 31, 2015 at 02:42:15PM +0200, Viktor Gazdag wrote: >>>> Benchmarking: sha256crypt-cuda, crypt(3) $5$ (rounds=5000) [SHA256 >>>> CUDA (inefficient, please use sha256crypt-opencl instead)]... FAILED >>>> (cmp_all(7)) >>> >>> We could want to investigate why this one fails for you, but anyway you >>> should be using sha256crypt-opencl instead. >> >> This is issue #1532 and may actually be a bug in CUDA (but we haven't seen many of those): It started failing with CUDA 7. I had a look at it but found no obvious problem with our code.
Powered by blists - more mailing lists
Confused about mailing lists and their use? Read about mailing lists on Wikipedia and check out these guidelines on proper formatting of your messages.