[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <d448b543e52db4a94e4126b8f1145684@smtp.hushmail.com>
Date: Sat, 09 May 2015 11:11:45 +0200
From: magnum <john.magnum@...hmail.com>
To: john-users@...ts.openwall.com
Subject: Re: Advise on best approach (truecrypt pw based on pdf
file)
On 2015-05-09 00:56, Demian Smith wrote:
> Judging by the current status, it looks like it is doing a goodish job:
>> 0g 23000p 0:00:09:18 0g/s 41.15p/s 82.31c/s 82.31C/s Tfneatwa..Tfneotps
>> 0g 25868p 0:00:13:15 0g/s 32.50p/s 65.00c/s 65.00C/s Iceuaeog..Iceuabab
>
>
> So it looks -to me - as if I am on the right track, mainly due to
> --make-charset and incremental mode are doing a really great job there.
Good, candidates look OK now. We still have two issues:
Even if incremental now runs what you intended, it could take a LONG
time (as in years) to hit the correct phrase. What if you use that
wordlist you produced and instead of making a fake pot file, use it
directly as a wordlist in a crack? If it's the correct book I reckon
you'd crack your password in no time, no?
Also, speed doesn't look too good. It seems to run slow. Or maybe our
test vectors doesn't reflect real-world costs.
Are you running without OpenMP, or on a CPU with just one core? Please
stop this job (as you probably know it can be resumed) and post the
benchmark figures from:
$ ../run/john -test -form:tc_*
Also, when you resume the job, copy the inital lines output when job
starts and report them too; Is it loading two "hashes"? Shouldn't it be
just one?
magnum
Powered by blists - more mailing lists
Confused about mailing lists and their use?
Read about mailing lists on Wikipedia
and check out these
guidelines on proper formatting of your messages.
