[<prev] [next>] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <5331E8F5.2080302@securibox.net>
Date: Tue, 25 Mar 2014 21:37:09 +0100
From: "-.-PhanTom-.-" <phantom@...uribox.net>
To: john-users@...ts.openwall.com
Subject: Re: Re: john-1.8.0-Win-32 - john.omp.exe - cores used
Hi
testing the mailing list.. hope it works :D
I also figured that the openMP flags probbaly did not get un-commented
in that build.
I did do that in the win64-build I have been trying to compile myself,
but with no success yet (see my reply to JimF post on the guide he made
to compile Bleeding under Cygwin (64bit)
H:\HA\john179w2\john179\run>john-omp -t
Benchmarking: Traditional DES [128/128 BS SSE2]... DONE
Many salts: 11338K c/s real, 3265K c/s virtual
Only one salt: 10791K c/s real, 3204K c/s virtual
H:\HA\john179w2\john179\run>john -t
Benchmarking: Traditional DES [128/128 BS SSE2]... DONE
Many salts: 4506K c/s real, 4635K c/s virtual
Only one salt: 4312K c/s real, 4425K c/s virtual
So only 152% better with 4 cores for DES in john179w2.
H:\HA\john179j5w\john179j5\run>john-omp -test
Benchmarking: Traditional DES [128/128 BS SSE2]... (4xOMP) DONE
Many salts: 12315K c/s real, 3276K c/s virtual
Only one salt: 10764K c/s real, 3087K c/s virtual
H:\HA\john179j5w\john179j5\run>john -test
Benchmarking: Traditional DES [128/128 BS SSE2]... DONE
Many salts: 4670K c/s real, 4675K c/s virtual
Only one salt: 4505K c/s real, 4517K c/s virtual
And around 164% better with 4 cores for john179j5w.
I never really got around to learning my way around Linux as on OS, but
I guess the userfriendlyness has come a long way since I last tried.
I guess I could try to install Ubuntu in a VmWare sessions and try to
compile there...
Would Ubuntu in a WVWare session perform as well as a native Ubuntu
dualboot installation?
Powered by blists - more mailing lists
Confused about mailing lists and their use?
Read about mailing lists on Wikipedia
and check out these
guidelines on proper formatting of your messages.
