|
Message-ID: <f65f619e78da65b8889f141767fb7442@smtp.hushmail.com> Date: Fri, 22 Nov 2013 19:38:43 +0100 From: magnum <john.magnum@...hmail.com> To: john-users@...ts.openwall.com Subject: Re: Questions and suggestions to build a home cracking box. :) On 2013-11-22 14:55, Richard Miles wrote: > On Wed, Nov 20, 2013 at 8:31 AM, Rich Rumble <richrumble@...il.com> wrote: >> Yes HC is ahead of JtR in this regard, and they don't want to share >> their efforts with us or anyone for that matter :( That's not fair: Atom has shared *detailed* information of how he optimized things. Telling him he "should" release his code would be no more correct than telling me I should NOT release mine. That's his and my decisions. Besides, Hashcat is still free as in no money. That's not half bad. > That's very sad. I know that jTr's developers are amazing hackers, why not > reverse engineering their code? Is it illegal or so complex? Lulz, we have absolutely no need to reverse Hashcat. We know exactly how to make things faster. We just lack time and developers to adjust the good old code base we're "stuck" with. Once upon a time (starting before some of our listeners were born) Solar designed JtR core code for a single core CPU and this code base is fricking ingenious - for THAT. The problems we get with OMP scaling and GPU performance are mostly caused by us stubbornly holding on to reusing that code base. Any one of us jumbo-gpu-developers (we are few) could probably write a standalone dumb-bruteforce "fast-hash" format that approaches Hashcat speeds (I'm not saying we can do it better) - but I'm not interested. I'm interested in making the JtR code base suitable for the task. Hashcat will likely always be a tad faster (I almost hope it will) and we use it as a benchmark: Whenever I get anywhere near Hashcat speeds, I know I'm not doing things completely wrong. magnum
Powered by blists - more mailing lists
Confused about mailing lists and their use? Read about mailing lists on Wikipedia and check out these guidelines on proper formatting of your messages.