[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20131120143045.GA11000@16s.us>
Date: Wed, 20 Nov 2013 09:30:45 -0500
From: "Richard B. Tilley (Brad)" <brad@....us>
To: john-users@...ts.openwall.com
Subject: Re: Questions and suggestions to build a home cracking
box. :)
I would not discount a smart approach. Speed is overrated. Efficiency and brains are underrated. Don't get me wrong, a certain level of performance is required to effectively crack passwords, and JtR is certainly fast enough for the job (and then some). Yes, there is faster cracking software, but JtR is more than fast enough.
Hope this helps,
Brad
On Wed, Nov 20, 2013 at 08:07:15AM -0600, Richard Miles wrote:
> Hi Lukas,
>
> Thanks for your answer.
>
> I intend to use just jTr because at the moment it's the only too that I
> really enjoy and I have tons of scripts to automate attacks for them.
> However, based on Magnum answer I may reconsider, since looks like that
> sadly competitors are very ahead with GPU technology. :(
>
> I will be cracking basically 95% of the time the following hashes:NTLMv2,
> netntlm, netntlmv2, MySQL (local hashes and network), MSSQL (local hashes
> and network), lotus, mscash and mscash2.
>
> Further answers and suggestions are very welcome. :)
>
> Thanks
Powered by blists - more mailing lists
Confused about mailing lists and their use?
Read about mailing lists on Wikipedia
and check out these
guidelines on proper formatting of your messages.
