|
Message-ID: <73877ef917d3e40a35f88addefabab83@smtp.hushmail.com> Date: Tue, 23 Jul 2013 02:49:03 +0200 From: magnum <john.magnum@...hmail.com> To: john-users@...ts.openwall.com Subject: Re: Using DYNAMIC for implementing SHA-512 ^ 101 ? On 22 Jul, 2013, at 22:24 , Nicolas RUFF <nicolas.ruff@...il.com> wrote: >> Please let me know if you want to change the name of the plug-in (currently it >> is blackberry-es10). Also, is the input hash format ($bbes10$hash$salt) OK? > > Well, I don't really mind, as long as it works :) > > However, keeping trace of the username somewhere could prove handy when > confronted to a large hash database. Username, userid, GECOS etc. fields can always be used too. They are separated by ':' while the hash parts in this case are separated by '$'. This line will work fine: username:$bbes10$hash$salt Or this: username:$bbes10$hash$salt:::some other known data In the latter case "some other known data" (eg. full names, email addresses and/or whatever you might have) will be used in Single mode for producing candidates. The two empty fields (producing three ':' in a row) are non-filled-in numerical user and group ids. Use them if you have them. magnum
Powered by blists - more mailing lists
Confused about mailing lists and their use? Read about mailing lists on Wikipedia and check out these guidelines on proper formatting of your messages.