|
Message-ID: <CANWtx007YnZDurUSrx6doAO4TAyuF1HZ2YHKG4MXOgpnQXe3ZQ@mail.gmail.com> Date: Tue, 19 Mar 2013 15:26:57 -0400 From: Rich Rumble <richrumble@...il.com> To: john-users@...ts.openwall.com Subject: Re: Case Toggling On Tue, Mar 19, 2013 at 2:46 PM, magnum <john.magnum@...hmail.com> wrote: > On 19 Mar, 2013, at 16:21 , Rich Rumble <richrumble@...il.com> wrote: > > > I'm curious why I'd use the "NT" rule as opposed to "t" ? > > > > TDQT[z0]T[z1]T[z2]T[z3]T[z4]T[z5]T[z6]T[z7]T[z8]T[z9]T[zA]T[zB]T[zC] > > vs > > t <D >4 > > t toggles the whole word just once: The word "passWORD" will become > "PASSword" and only that. > > That NT rule line expands to 8192 lines after the preprocessor, for > producing 8192 possible combinations of toggling, and the complete NT > ruleset is supposed to do this for any length (within limits) and produce > few or no dupes. > I did some experimenting and I saw that. Thanks! -rich
Powered by blists - more mailing lists
Confused about mailing lists and their use? Read about mailing lists on Wikipedia and check out these guidelines on proper formatting of your messages.