[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <91D0B62A2328924087649659387009F5861C8B65@EUMAILDAG2.eu.kaspersky.com>
Date: Wed, 13 Feb 2013 17:07:41 +0000
From: Nicolas Brulez <nicolas.Brulez@...persky.com>
To: "john-users@...ts.openwall.com" <john-users@...ts.openwall.com>
Subject: RE: RAR Cracking with JtR Jumbo (Files found during
forensics)
Thanks Rich!
This leads to the second n00b question :)
using john.exe or the omp version, i get the same speed.
I should be able to run more threads on this cpu, is there something to change in order to get Multi core support?
I guess i will RTFM some more.
Nico
--
Best regards,
Nicolas Brulez | Malware Expert - Global Research and Analysis Team | Kaspersky Lab
-----Message d'origine-----
De : Rich Rumble [mailto:richrumble@...il.com]
Envoyé : mercredi 13 février 2013 17:53
À : john-users@...ts.openwall.com
Objet : Re: [john-users] RAR Cracking with JtR Jumbo (Files found during forensics)
On Wed, Feb 13, 2013 at 11:40 AM, Solar Designer <solar@...nwall.com> wrote:
> Not necessarily. Is your 1200 c/s based on crark's reporting while
> cracking one of these RARs, or on a separate benchmark run?
> > Who knows, we may be lucky ;)
> Have you already tested the entire RockYou list (~14M uniques) without
> rules?
>
I'm getting 150-160 c/s on 8 threads(omp) using a Cwgwin\win32 build (Intel
Xeon E5620@...0GHz)
c:\john-1.7.9-jumbo-7\run>john-omp.exe brulez.txt -format=rar -pot=rar.pot
-w=rockyou.txt
Loaded 3 password hashes with 3 different salts (RAR3 SHA-1 AES [32/32])
guesses: 0 time: 0:00:00:02 0.00% c/s: 150 trying: carolina - david
guesses: 0 time: 0:00:00:04 0.00% c/s: 151 trying: alyssa - horses
I've got more resources to throw around, but if the nature of the password
is unknown, at these speeds I don't know if it will help.
-rich
Powered by blists - more mailing lists
Confused about mailing lists and their use?
Read about mailing lists on Wikipedia
and check out these
guidelines on proper formatting of your messages.
