|
Message-ID: <8192a058f7d0aece36b111c2f032e852@smtp.hushmail.com> Date: Sat, 9 Feb 2013 15:54:24 +0100 From: magnum <john.magnum@...hmail.com> To: john-users@...ts.openwall.com Subject: Re: Support for PBKDF2 (SHA512) On 9 Feb, 2013, at 15:41 , Dhiru Kholia <dhiru.kholia@...il.com> wrote: > On Sat, Feb 9, 2013 at 7:28 PM, magnum <john.magnum@...hmail.com> wrote: >> I'm implementing support for $ml$ format with '.' delimiter. From what I can google, a grub hash looks like this: >> >> grub.pbkdf2.sha512.10000.4483972AD2C52E1F590B3E2260795FDA9CA0B07B96FF492814CA9775F08C4B59CD1707F10B269E09B61B1E2D11729BCA8D62B7827B25B093EC58C4C1EAC23137.DF4FCB5DD91340D6D31E33423E4210AD47C7A4DF9FA16F401663BF288C20BF973530866178FE6D134256E4DBEFBD984B652332EED3ACAED834FEA7B73CAE851D >> >> So what format *do* we support? Why do we use a '$' delimiter? Can I drop that? > > The current ml2john.py program produces hashes starting in > $pbkdf2-hmac-sha512$ and it uses '.' delimiter. Then it did not work until now. The format only supported '$' delimiter. > This change was done after multiple rounds of discussions with other developers. > > IIRC in the past, we used to produce hashes starting with $ml$ with > '$' as the delimiter. I had no idea that an external tool had adopted > our "old-style" / development hash format. We did not invent that. The "dave" tool is older than us (I think). Anyway, I have code that supports any of these three tags as well as any delimiter of '.' or '$'. I'll commit it after some more testing. BTW I also fixed bogus stuff in valid vs binary/salt. We should catch bad input in valid(), not later. magnum
Powered by blists - more mailing lists
Confused about mailing lists and their use? Read about mailing lists on Wikipedia and check out these guidelines on proper formatting of your messages.