[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CAFi77z2=B8pV2Nk3q+0zK_hObmBPYopfQ=tuKtWxNYodxmivZQ@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 20 Dec 2012 21:27:33 +0100
From: vadim vitaly <vadim.vitaly@...il.com>
To: john-users@...ts.openwall.com
Subject: Re: Mangling rules for different ciphers
Thanks Simon, can't wait to test it.
On Thu, Dec 20, 2012 at 2:56 AM, newangels newangels <
contact.newangels@...il.com> wrote:
> Thank you really appreciated,
>
> Regards,
>
> Don
>
> 2012/12/19, Simon Marechal <simon@...quise.net>:
> > Following my Passwords^12 presentation, I generated mangling rules for
> > different ciphers. This is just a test, downloadable there:
> >
> > http://www.banquise.net/bin/2012-12-19-mangling.tar.bz2
> >
> > It contains the following files:
> > processWordlist - the time it takes (in seconds) to mangle a wordlist on
> > my computer
> > processtime - the time it takes (in seconds) to test a password against
> > a single salt with DES on my computer
> >
> > And the results:
> > result-des
> > result-des-us
> > result-fasthash
> > result-fasthash-us
> > result-slowhash
> > result-slowhash-us
> >
> > Files finishing without -us have been trained with the new sraveau
> > wikipedia wordlist, and rockyou. Those with a -us suffix have been
> > generated using the new sraveau wikipedia wordlist, limited to the US
> > keymap, and rockyou.
> >
> > The "des" files have been trained with the aforementioned parameters,
> > the "fasthash" for the case where mangling the wordlist takes much more
> > time than testing individual passwords, and "slowhash" for the case
> > where testing a single password takes much more time than mangling the
> > wordlist.
> >
> > It will probably need some fixing (removal of the performance values,
> > and probably fixing the [ and ]), but should perform well. I will bench
> > them ASAP. In the meanwhile, please let me know if this is useful to you.
> >
>
Powered by blists - more mailing lists
Confused about mailing lists and their use?
Read about mailing lists on Wikipedia
and check out these
guidelines on proper formatting of your messages.
