|
Message-ID: <8a2019e7e1afde7c889c7435245ee6eb@smtp.hushmail.com> Date: Sat, 8 Dec 2012 18:05:03 +0100 From: magnum <john.magnum@...hmail.com> To: john-users@...ts.openwall.com Subject: Re: New format: krb5ng-opencl - cracking speed? On 8 Dec, 2012, at 14:50 , Dhiru Kholia <dhiru.kholia@...il.com> wrote: > On Sat, Dec 8, 2012 at 7:12 PM, buawig <buawig@...il.com> wrote: >> thanks for adding krb5ng-opencl! What speeds do you reach with it? >> Anyone tried yet? > > ATI 6970 (non-OMP build) > > ✗ ../run/john -fo:krb5ng-opencl -t > OpenCL platform 0: AMD Accelerated Parallel Processing, 2 device(s). > Using device 0: Cayman > Local worksize (LWS) 64, Global worksize (GWS) 32768 > Benchmarking: Kerberos 5 AS-REQ Pre-Auth aes256-cts-hmac-sha1-96 > [OpenCL 4x]... DONE > Raw: 54274 c/s real, 364088 c/s virtual > > ✗ ../run/john -fo:krb5ng-opencl -t --request-scalar > OpenCL platform 0: AMD Accelerated Parallel Processing, 2 device(s). > Using device 0: Cayman > Local worksize (LWS) 64, Global worksize (GWS) 131072 > Benchmarking: Kerberos 5 AS-REQ Pre-Auth aes256-cts-hmac-sha1-96 > [OpenCL]... DONE > Raw: 55894 c/s real, 369216 c/s virtual So maybe I should make Cayman default to scalar for this format. Here's a couple more: A Macbook Pro laptop (not OMP here but it's got AES-NI): OpenCL platform 0: Apple, 2 device(s). Using device 1: GeForce GT 650M Local worksize (LWS) 768, Global worksize (GWS) 1536 Benchmarking: Kerberos 5 AS-REQ Pre-Auth aes256-cts-hmac-sha1-96 [OpenCL]... DONE Raw: 6193 c/s real, 128000 c/s virtual Openwall's test rig: OpenCL platform 0: NVIDIA CUDA, 1 device(s). Using device 0: GeForce GTX 570 Local worksize (LWS) 128, Global worksize (GWS) 65536 Benchmarking: Kerberos 5 AS-REQ Pre-Auth aes256-cts-hmac-sha1-96 [OpenCL]... DONE Raw: 35617 c/s real, 35520 c/s virtual OpenCL platform 1: AMD Accelerated Parallel Processing, 2 device(s). Using device 0: Tahiti Local worksize (LWS) 64, Global worksize (GWS) 262144 Benchmarking: Kerberos 5 AS-REQ Pre-Auth aes256-cts-hmac-sha1-96 [OpenCL]... DONE Raw: 102001 c/s real, 429744 c/s virtual OMP and/or AES-NI capabilities currently make a difference but I'll probably move the post processing to GPU at some point in time: OpenCL platform 0: NVIDIA CUDA, 1 device(s). Using device 0: GeForce GTX 570 Local worksize (LWS) 128, Global worksize (GWS) 65536 Benchmarking: Kerberos 5 AS-REQ Pre-Auth aes256-cts-hmac-sha1-96 [OpenCL]... (8xOMP) DONE Raw: 37991 c/s real, 32932 c/s virtual OpenCL platform 1: AMD Accelerated Parallel Processing, 2 device(s). Using device 0: Tahiti Local worksize (LWS) 256, Global worksize (GWS) 262144 Benchmarking: Kerberos 5 AS-REQ Pre-Auth aes256-cts-hmac-sha1-96 [OpenCL]... (8xOMP) DONE Raw: 125427 c/s real, 262144 c/s virtual magnum
Powered by blists - more mailing lists
Confused about mailing lists and their use? Read about mailing lists on Wikipedia and check out these guidelines on proper formatting of your messages.