[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CADkMHCnGkF6BeNyuB3r-+yVQ6jWqz5EXk4PayktBC8vPMkM2Zg@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Fri, 7 Dec 2012 06:44:14 -0700
From: RB <aoz.syn@...il.com>
To: john-users@...ts.openwall.com
Subject: Re: GPU based cracking, AMD or NVIDIA
On Fri, Dec 7, 2012 at 12:16 AM, <hm0@....net> wrote:
> I'm thinking of trying john (and maybe some other progs) on GPU. I wonder if better go for gtx 660 or AMD 7870 (well I dont want to spend $300-400+ for a card...).
>
> I tried to find out if amd or nvidia is in general better (faster / maybe openCL vs CUDA?) and/or better supported (maybe again opencl vs cuda?) for gpu based cracking (eg hash, aes, wpa ...).
> I only found some rather old benchmarks.
For non-graphical computing (e.g. password cracking or BTC mining), it
is my experience that ATI/AMD cards are significantly faster.
> btw: does gpu based cracking benefit from more RAM on the gfx card?
I'm sure it does to a point, but it doesn't appear to be as important
as the speed of the card itself. Those writing the algorithms running
on the cards will be able to answer more assertively.
Powered by blists - more mailing lists
Confused about mailing lists and their use?
Read about mailing lists on Wikipedia
and check out these
guidelines on proper formatting of your messages.
