[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <10301a3a60c2e73e43ffa5dfba4da651@smtp.hushmail.com>
Date: Wed, 22 Aug 2012 09:03:10 +0200
From: magnum <john.magnum@...hmail.com>
To: john-users@...ts.openwall.com
Subject: Re: john-1.7.9-jumbo-6 Solaris x86 build uploaded to
the custom builds page--I forgot to update to the wiki page
On 2012-08-08 03:48, Robert B. Harris wrote:
> In my experience, Solaris is the hardest to statically link.
>
> Making sure one has all the static libraries is a pain.
>
> I'm planning on making a static build of libomp and librt, if that is even
> possible on Solaris. This recent build doesn't have static rt.
>
> Are you looking to have a Solaris-omp-static build or something?
Well, if you routinely need to edit the Makefile for the static builds,
we might try to create such target instead. If at all possible.
magnum
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: magnum [mailto:john.magnum@...hmail.com]
> Sent: Tuesday, August 07, 2012 4:39 PM
> To: john-users@...ts.openwall.com
> Subject: Re: [john-users] john-1.7.9-jumbo-6 Solaris x86 build uploaded to
> the custom builds page--I forgot to update to the wiki page
>
> On 2012-08-07 22:33, Robert B. Harris wrote:
>> This version is statically linked to OpenSSL v1.0.1c
>>
>> Compiled with gcc v4.6.1
>
> Robert,
>
> Is static linking a walk in the park nowadays, or do you have some special
> tweaks you need to apply each time? Bottom line: is there anything we
> could/should change in the main tree?
>
> magnum
>
>
>
Powered by blists - more mailing lists
Confused about mailing lists and their use?
Read about mailing lists on Wikipedia
and check out these
guidelines on proper formatting of your messages.
