[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CAD0jYq8jtFHNC=CVZ2F1OAa8yVNVu=jrsK2-56L6p6F+mcJ_8w@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Fri, 18 May 2012 19:37:26 +0200
From: pierzi <pierzi@...il.com>
To: john-users@...ts.openwall.com
Subject: Re: Performance Considerations of stdin
Hello Brad
I've been using jtr in stdin mode with maskprocessor from hashcat tools,
which seems to be one the fastest word generator...
to be honest i didn't saw any performance difference between stdin and
incremental mode.
Best regards
Bartosz
2012/5/18 Brad Tilley <brad@...ystems.com>
> Hello John Users,
>
> What, if any, performance considerations are there when passing word
> candidates to JTR via stdin? I plan on doing some tests to see first-hand,
> but before doing so I wanted to ask here in case others have had some
> experience with this.
>
> Basically, I'm wondering if a word generation program that passed words
> into JTR via stdin would perform better than when JTR is doing both word
> mangling and hash generation, hash testing, etc all by itself.
>
> ehco -n word | john --sdtin
>
> Has anyone had experience performance testing something such as this?
>
> Thanks for any advice,
>
> Brad
>
>
Powered by blists - more mailing lists
Confused about mailing lists and their use?
Read about mailing lists on Wikipedia
and check out these
guidelines on proper formatting of your messages.
