|
Message-ID: <4F588C92.9070806@dilmun.ls.fi.upm.es>
Date: Thu, 08 Mar 2012 11:40:18 +0100
From: Javier González del Tánago Liberal
<jtanago@...mun.ls.fi.upm.es>
To: john-users@...ts.openwall.com
Subject: Re: Best performance MPI vs OMP
On 02/03/12 12:14, Javier González del Tánago Liberal wrote:
> On 01/03/12 22:37, Solar Designer wrote:
>> Please also post the corresponding MPI benchmarks in here, or maybe
>> add a third table to the wiki. The benchmark results you posted so
>> far are probably those relevant to your intended use, which is just
>> right, but for the wiki we need info on specific hash types. Thanks,
>> Alexander
> Thanks for your help,
> I will do more test changing the OMP parameters and I will publish
> them as soon as I can.
>
Hi!
These are the results:
DES (many/one salt)
- MPI: 54410K/51601K
- OMP: 47087K/21626K
LM
- MPI: 786762K
- OMP: 50823K (1)
NT
- MPI: 533520K
- OMP: 18498K (2)
NETLM (many/one salt)
- MPI: 53168K/17572K
- OMP: 27787K/865569 (1)
NETNTLM (many/one salt)
- MPI: 53268K/39016K
- OMP: 30736K/7077
(1) With OMP_NUM_THREADS=24
(2) Same result with OMP_NUM_THREADS={24,48}
I did real test and these are the results:
Crack LM Hash of "ex&31"
- MPI: 1m
- OMP: 29m
Crack LM Hash of "ex&314"
- MPI: 1m
- OMP: 55m
Crack LM Hash of "gol27$"
- MPI: 27sec
- OMP: 11m
With NT Hash the results are quite similar, there is a big difference
between MPI and OMP.
I will publish the results on the wiki.
--
-------------------------------------
Javier González del Tánago Liberal
-------------------------------------
e-mail: jtanago@...mun.ls.fi.upm.es
-------------------------------------
CriptoLab. Despacho 6305.
Facultad de Informática.
Campus de Montegancedo S/N
Universidad Politécnica de Madrid.
Boadilla del Monte. Madrid (Spain)
-------------------------------------
Download attachment "smime.p7s" of type "application/pkcs7-signature" (2912 bytes)
Powered by blists - more mailing lists
Confused about mailing lists and their use? Read about mailing lists on Wikipedia and check out these guidelines on proper formatting of your messages.