[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <4F4FD81A.2030005@dilmun.ls.fi.upm.es>
Date: Thu, 01 Mar 2012 21:12:10 +0100
From: Javier González del Tánago Liberal
<jtanago@...mun.ls.fi.upm.es>
To: john-users@...ts.openwall.com
Subject: Re: Best performance MPI vs OMP
El 01/03/12 19:58, magnum escribió:
> On 03/01/2012 06:47 PM, Javier González del Tánago Liberal wrote:
>> I've been trying John and I noticed a big difference in performance
>> between MPI and OMP (LM, NTLM overall). These are the results:
> OMP and MPI are very different beasts and OMP is often better in real
> life. In general I would recommend you use OMP if the format supports
> it, and MPI otherwise. Maybe LM is an exception, it scales very poorly
> with OMP.
>
> magnum
>
Hi!
I did real tests with both. With nethalflm for example, MPI took six
minutes to break the password, with OMP I aborted the process after two
hours. It's incredible the big difference between both.
Thanks!
--
-------------------------------------
Javier González del Tánago Liberal
-------------------------------------
e-mail: jtanago@...mun.ls.fi.upm.es
-------------------------------------
CriptoLab. Despacho 6305.
Facultad de Informática.
Campus de Montegancedo S/N
Universidad Politécnica de Madrid.
Boadilla del Monte. Madrid (Spain)
-------------------------------------
Download attachment "smime.p7s" of type "application/pkcs7-signature" (2912 bytes)
Powered by blists - more mailing lists
Confused about mailing lists and their use?
Read about mailing lists on Wikipedia
and check out these
guidelines on proper formatting of your messages.
