[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20120120200131.GA8127@openwall.com>
Date: Sat, 21 Jan 2012 00:01:31 +0400
From: Solar Designer <solar@...nwall.com>
To: john-users@...ts.openwall.com
Subject: Re: OpenMP progress report bug with multiple 1 thread instances
On Fri, Jan 20, 2012 at 07:54:55PM +0000, Alex Sicamiotis wrote:
> guesses: 5 time: 2:05:05:04 25% c/s: 4146K trying: mrd75003 - mrd70198
> guesses: 5 time: 2:06:03:16 0% c/s: 4151K trying: mxq14759 - mxq18854
...
> ...so it seems that, at the exact point of time when the second instance started (a few hours ago), the first instance got a reset in its progress report to 0% - but continued cracking ok. The 2 instances are running from separate directories so no interaction between them.
Yes, must be a coincidence.
> It seems like a trivial / minor bug, but thought to report it anyway.
Thank you for reporting this.
Were you running wordlist mode? What was the wordlist file size? Is it
possible that you hit file offset of 2 GB or 4 GB at this point? Were
wordlist rules enabled? What make target did you build John with?
Alexander
Powered by blists - more mailing lists
Confused about mailing lists and their use?
Read about mailing lists on Wikipedia
and check out these
guidelines on proper formatting of your messages.
