[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-id: <85EFCA43-4024-4F15-98EA-A1E1A43E766B@erols.com>
Date: Thu, 22 Sep 2011 21:18:10 -0400
From: Erik Winkler <ewinkler@...ls.com>
To: john-users@...ts.openwall.com
Subject: Re: OpenCL performance numbers on Radeon HD 5870
Alexander,
You are correct, this is different.
Here is the output from the other CRYPTMD5 and CRYPTSHA256. The cryptsha256 fails for some reason.
/john -test -format:CRYPTMD5OPENCL
Benchmarking: CRYPTMD5OPENCL [MD5-based CRYPT]... end read_kernel_source
OpenCL Device: ATI Radeon HD 5670
setup context
build kernel
end build program
DONE
Raw: 24284 c/s real, 1024K c/s virtual
./john -test -format:CRYPTSHA256OPENCL
Benchmarking: CRYPTSHA256OPENCL [SHA256-based CRYPT]... end read_kernel_source
OpenCL Device: ATI Radeon HD 5670
setup context
build kernel
end build program
end init
crypt_all
FAILED (get_hash[0](0))
On Sep 22, 2011, at 8:27 PM, Solar Designer wrote:
> How is this relevant? I think it is not. Maybe you're confusing Lukas'
> built-in SHA-crypt support (in CUDA and OpenCL) with my implementation
> of "generic crypt(3)" in the official JtR? These are distinct things.
>
> Or am I missing something?
>
> Thanks again,
>
> Alexander
Powered by blists - more mailing lists
Confused about mailing lists and their use?
Read about mailing lists on Wikipedia
and check out these
guidelines on proper formatting of your messages.
