[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <4E5FEC7D.7050406@bredband.net>
Date: Thu, 01 Sep 2011 22:35:09 +0200
From: magnum <rawsmooth@...dband.net>
To: john-users@...ts.openwall.com
Subject: New rule reject flag added [was: Couple of questions regarding rules
(preprocessor) and truncation]
On 2011-03-20 02:43, Solar Designer wrote:
> On my to do list, I have this item: "new reject flag: unless passwords
> of length N or longer are supported". This would let you do what you
> wanted by using the new rule reject flag along with the preprocessor's
> backreferences. The syntax could be something like:
>
> ->[2-9A-Z]>\0 '\0 A[0z]"1234"
In fact I implemented this myself the very same day but completely
lacking error checking. I've used it heavily since. I recently added
error checking too, and I think this is a proper patch now.
magnum
View attachment "0009-N-reject-flag-reject-unless-length-N-is-supported.patch" of type "text/x-patch" (1350 bytes)
Powered by blists - more mailing lists
Confused about mailing lists and their use?
Read about mailing lists on Wikipedia
and check out these
guidelines on proper formatting of your messages.
