|
Message-ID: <20110323082109.GA6365@openwall.com> Date: Wed, 23 Mar 2011 11:21:09 +0300 From: Solar Designer <solar@...nwall.com> To: john-users@...ts.openwall.com Subject: Re: Interface for John On Wed, Mar 23, 2011 at 02:03:10AM -0400, joseph varghese wrote: > Now I've got some idea about the task and I've started learning wxWidgets in > c++. I hope i could come up with a simple interface in a few days. Sounds good. Here are a few things to add: I did a quick web search on possible existing widgets that would be usable for approach #2 (integrated). Here are some to consider, in order of increasing complexity (as far as I could figure out in a few minutes looking): wxListCtrl (and simpler variants of it: wxListView, WxListBox) wxGrid wxSheet http://wxcode.sourceforge.net/showcomp.php?name=wxSheet http://old.nabble.com/wxSheet-and-wxGrid-survey-to3089675.html As to the O(n^2) complexity, I think I need to explain. We may have O(n) complexity in our own code when we insert the many widgets and/or data records into the container widget. If the insert operation also has O(n) complexity (perhaps because it traverses the list of already inserted items), then this is where we get O(n^2). Perhaps the specialized widgets I mention above avoid this (by providing a bulk insert interface or by referencing an "external" data structure that we'll maintain ourselves, and/or by avoiding O(n) complexity algorithms for simple operations), but we need to check. These are just my guesses. Alexander
Powered by blists - more mailing lists
Confused about mailing lists and their use? Read about mailing lists on Wikipedia and check out these guidelines on proper formatting of your messages.