[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <4D88F79C.1030405@bredband.net>
Date: Tue, 22 Mar 2011 20:25:16 +0100
From: magnum <rawsmooth@...dband.net>
To: john-users@...ts.openwall.com
Subject: Re: single mode
On 2011-03-20 21:06, I wrote:
> I feel I lack some details about single mode. Actually the best would be
> if one could use --stdout together with a [small] input file, for
> studying/tweaking rules. But it's not important enough to call for so
> maybe I should just hack in an fprintf somewhere and study it.
I did that fprintf hack so I can answer most of this myself. Here is
what it looks like:
1. From the user's line in the input file, the following are taken as
'words':
* The username, verbatim
* All words from the GECOS field that starts with a letter and consists
of alphanumeric only (anything else is scrapped)
* The last part of the home directory (/usr/home/alpha becoms "alpha")
2. Even with no rules (or actually when using the ':' no-op rule), all
words alone plus all possible pairs of these words (concatenated with no
delimiter) are tried. Also, another similar set of pairs is tried with
*first* word truncated to one character.
Words: john, doe
Candidates:
john <- alone
doe
johndoe <- pairs
doejohn
jdoe <- truncated pairs
djohn
However, only the first four words are allowed as the first half of a
pair. If there are five words, the fifth will only ever be the second
half of a pair. This is to limit the number of combinations and this
limit can be changed by altering SINGLE_WORDS_PAIR_MAX in params.h and
recompiling.
3. Using rules (with "1", "2" and/or "+" in them), all the word pairs we
just saw will be available to your own rules. So if you have a rule saying
-p1$_2
you will have the following candidates in addition to the ones we got
just from the no-op rule:
john_doe
doe_john
j_doe
d_john
The SINGLE_WORDS_PAIR_MAX limit applies here too.
> Would I ever need to swap 1 and 2 in rules? I mean, if I have this rule:
>
> -p 1 $@ 2
>
> is there any reason to also have:
>
> -p 2 $@ 1
>
> or will that be tried anyway?
It will be tried anyway unless one of the words is word #5 or higher on
the input line.
There may be a little more to this that I haven't noticed but this is
the gist of it.
magnum
Powered by blists - more mailing lists
Confused about mailing lists and their use?
Read about mailing lists on Wikipedia
and check out these
guidelines on proper formatting of your messages.
