Follow @Openwall on Twitter for new release announcements and other news
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <000301cbe35d$a1326810$e3973830$@net>
Date: Tue, 15 Mar 2011 17:09:18 -0500
From: "jfoug" <jfoug@....net>
To: <john-users@...ts.openwall.com>
Subject: RE: starting and 'running' the md5-gen format

john -test=5 -for=md5_gen(1064)
Benchmarking: md5_gen(1064) md5_gen(1064): sha1($p) SSE2 [128x1 (MD5_Go)]...
DONE
Raw:    6753K c/s

john -test=5 -for=raw-sha1
Benchmarking: Raw SHA-1 SSE2 [raw-sha1 SSE2]... DONE
Raw:    7954K c/s

john_oldersse2 -test=5 -for=raw-sha1
Benchmarking: Raw SHA-1 SSE2 [raw-sha1 SSE2]... DONE
Raw:    7456K c/s

I have 'some' SSE startup into the 'generic' (md5_gen) code.  It is not
perfect, and will likely need to be optimized more.

However, it now will use SSE, if the build is SSE.  I also have sped up the
'raw-sha1' in SSE/MMX if using the .S code (x32), as can be seen above.  The
test with john_oldersse2 is timing of 'current' released john.

The SHA1 - SSE code in the generic type does not yet do intrinsic.  I will
have to do some additional code to get that working.

Jim.



Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Confused about mailing lists and their use? Read about mailing lists on Wikipedia and check out these guidelines on proper formatting of your messages.