Follow @Openwall on Twitter for new release announcements and other news
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20110217174335.GA26058@openwall.com>
Date: Thu, 17 Feb 2011 20:43:35 +0300
From: Solar Designer <solar@...nwall.com>
To: john-users@...ts.openwall.com
Subject: Re: OpenMP patch/DES SSE key setup patch

Tim,

Can you please add the below benchmark to the wiki, along with
documenting what system that is (perhaps some old dual-P4-Xeon)?
Also add a single-core benchmark (clean 1.7.6, no OpenMP) to the
appropriate table.  This will allow to see the parallelization
efficiency ... although HT makes this tricky.

http://openwall.info/wiki/john/benchmarks

Thanks,

Alexander

On Thu, Feb 17, 2011 at 12:39:41AM -0600, Tim Yardley wrote:
> $ GOMP_SPINCOUNT=100000 ./john -test
> Benchmarking: Traditional DES [128/128 BS SSE2]... DONE
> Many salts:     1622K c/s real, 406944 c/s virtual
> Only one salt:  1426K c/s real, 360975 c/s virtual
> 
> Benchmarking: BSDI DES (x725) [128/128 BS SSE2]... DONE
> Many salts:     54311 c/s real, 13615 c/s virtual
> Only one salt:  52851 c/s real, 13497 c/s virtual
> 
> Benchmarking: FreeBSD MD5 [32/32]... DONE
> Raw:    5714 c/s real, 5714 c/s virtual
> 
> Benchmarking: OpenBSD Blowfish (x32) [32/32 X2]... DONE
> Raw:    665 c/s real, 184 c/s virtual
> 
> Benchmarking: Kerberos AFS DES [48/64 4K MMX]... DONE
> Short:  214681 c/s real, 214681 c/s virtual
> Long:   579123 c/s real, 579123 c/s virtual
> 
> Benchmarking: LM DES [128/128 BS SSE2]... DONE
> Raw:    12985K c/s real, 3290K c/s virtual
> 
> Benchmarking: generic crypt(3) [?/32]... DONE
> Many salts:     292147 c/s real, 73109 c/s virtual
> Only one salt:  285696 c/s real, 71495 c/s virtual
> 
> /tmy

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Confused about mailing lists and their use? Read about mailing lists on Wikipedia and check out these guidelines on proper formatting of your messages.