[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <AANLkTinyPP-c87W2T0L9uVr1NB_OnqPaBc1YD8KmubEp@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Fri, 8 Oct 2010 21:37:57 -0400
From: Rich Rumble <richrumble@...il.com>
To: john-users@...ts.openwall.com
Subject: Re: multi-word rules (was: Rule to replace strings)
On Fri, Oct 8, 2010 at 8:13 PM, Solar Designer <solar@...nwall.com> wrote:
> On Fri, Oct 08, 2010 at 07:54:03PM -0400, Rich Rumble wrote:
>> In this same vein,
>
> Actually, I think this is a different topic, not closely related to this
> thread's original Subject and requesting a different feature. In fact,
> you did not quote any context because there was nothing relevant to
> quote. So I would have preferred to see this in its own thread. I've
> merely changed the Subject now (but did not break the thread).
>
Sorry about that, you are pedantic which is probably why JtR is how
good it is :)
> Yes, I agree that JtR should gain builtin multi-word support for
> wordlist rules. It already has this feature (for working with two words
> at once) for "single crack" mode (in fact, it did since 1990s), but not
> for wordlist mode yet.
Good to know, I thought of known force as well, but I think it's more
using digit and word "halves". I'd look forward to having such a feature
that is for certain!
-rich
Powered by blists - more mailing lists
Confused about mailing lists and their use?
Read about mailing lists on Wikipedia
and check out these
guidelines on proper formatting of your messages.
