|
Message-Id: <B3D39F7F-C2AD-41A2-A8E1-D53AC7DDB812@erols.com> Date: Tue, 14 Sep 2010 19:17:34 -0400 From: Erik Winkler <ewinkler@...ls.com> To: john-users@...ts.openwall.com Subject: Re: NTLM and OpenCL 1.0 On Sep 13, 2010, at 1:58 PM, Alain Espinosa wrote: > This is a more "polish" version. In my tests there are a speedup of 6x > (not all john, only transfer and crack). Erik may test this for a more > real benchmark. John in cygwin continue to not work, i test the code > in Windows with a simple program. I tested the new version and here are the benchmarks: OpenCL 64-bit ./john -test=15 -format:NT Benchmarking: NT MD4 [OpenCL 1.0]... OpenCL platform: <<< Apple >>> OpenCL device: <<< GeForce 9400M >>> DONE Raw: 9127K c/s real, 21100K c/s virtual 64-bit ./john -test=15 -format:NT Benchmarking: NT MD4 [128/128 X2 SSE2-16]... DONE Raw: 24121K c/s real, 24137K c/s virtual OpenCL SSE2 ./john -test=15 -format:NT Benchmarking: NT MD4 [OpenCL 1.0]... OpenCL platform: <<< Apple >>> OpenCL device: <<< GeForce 9400M >>> DONE Raw: 9313K c/s real, 21906K c/s virtual SSE2 ./john -test=15 -format:NT Benchmarking: NT MD4 [128/128 SSE2 + 32/32]... DONE Raw: 14783K c/s real, 14793K c/s virtual Big increase in benchmarks. It should work really well on a high-end video card. Erik
Powered by blists - more mailing lists
Confused about mailing lists and their use? Read about mailing lists on Wikipedia and check out these guidelines on proper formatting of your messages.