[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <A9B33EB8-E47C-4452-81A4-4F543A009C09@erols.com>
Date: Tue, 15 Jun 2010 09:48:24 -0400
From: Erik Winkler <ewinkler@...ls.com>
To: john-users@...ts.openwall.com
Subject: Re: 1.7.6-jumbo-2
Alexander,
I noticed the following difference between the patched and unpatched 1.7.6 benchmark for LM hashes on OS X. What does the patch change to cause such a significant difference? The Traditional DES calculation is not affected, so I am not sure of the cause.
Unpatched:
../run/john -test=10 -format:LM
Benchmarking: LM DES [128/128 BS SSE2-16]... DONE
Raw: 13021K c/s real, 13034K c/s virtual
After applying jumbo patch:
../run/john -test=10 -format:LM
Benchmarking: LM DES [128/128 BS SSE2-16]... DONE
Raw: 10317K c/s real, 10338K c/s virtual
Erik
On Jun 15, 2010, at 1:19 AM, Solar Designer wrote:
>
>
> As usual, any feedback is welcome.
>
> Alexander
Powered by blists - more mailing lists
Confused about mailing lists and their use?
Read about mailing lists on Wikipedia
and check out these
guidelines on proper formatting of your messages.
